AI × City Climate Action Hackathon 2026
Decide where to validate electric jeepney pilots first.
TL;DR: Screen 1,522 historic corridor records into 9 priorities for field validation, then show what the city must verify before spending.
Validation priority
Corridor Map
Compare routes, then open only the evidence you need
Reviewed OSM matches use observed member-way geometry. Other routes remain clearly labelled as historic screening records with planning geometry.
Use the route selector as the keyboard-accessible alternative to clicking map points. Dashed route lines indicate approximate or unverified source geometry.
Route Lens
One corridor, one clear decision
Loading route…
Evidence detail Open the eight supporting signals+
Live policy score
Confidence grade
Net tCO₂e / year range
Population exposure only
Mapped context; capacity unverified
Awaiting consent-based evidence
Top-10 probability
Comparable corridor pattern
What changes this decision?
Loading evidence sensitivity…
Feasibility snapshot
Put an order of magnitude beside the shortlist
Vehicle and charger figures are screening proxies, not supplier quotes or a budget. Financing remains explicitly missing.
Model restraint check
ML fills one missing historic activity field—nothing more.
Loading model comparison…
Scenario Lab
Compare policy choices without hiding trade-offs
Live ranks respond to normalized human-controlled weights. Robustness remains a labelled precomputed reference around the default lens.
Active policy mix
Compared with default
Phase-1 Portfolio
Build an evidence-validation shortlist, not a shopping list
The default eight-corridor result is precomputed by the deterministic pipeline. Changed constraints produce a clearly labelled interactive preview.
Selected corridors
Precomputed defaultWhy this differs from top-N
Active constraints
Corridor action queue
Top routes under the active policy lens
| Rank | Route | City | Priority | Evidence | Climate range | Robustness |
|---|
Evidence queue
Validate what could reverse the decision
Priority is based on deterministic field perturbation, not language-model confidence.
Planning & Evidence Assistant
Ask from the active route and scenario
The assistant receives structured evidence only. It cannot edit scores, policy weights or portfolio constraints.
Method & Sources
Transparent enough to challenge.
Open only what you need. The dashboard stays focused while assumptions, provenance and limitations remain one click away.
01 How to use Route2Zero+
- Choose the Metro Manila or LGU scope.
- Set a policy lens and inspect the live scenario ID.
- Select a corridor on the map or action queue.
- Read its eight signals and the evidence that could change the decision.
- Build a constrained Phase-1 validation portfolio and export the audit pack.
02 Why this decision matters+
Electrification resources and field-validation capacity are limited. Route2Zero helps city teams identify which corridors merit deeper work while keeping climate ranges, weak evidence and possible reversals visible.
03 Claims, assumptions and safeguards+
ML service intelligencePredicts historic service activity for anomaly detection and gap analysis; it is not ridership and is not used when the direct historic proxy is available.
Climate scenariosLow/base/high net CO₂e and energy results are deterministic scenario bounds, not statistical confidence intervals or measured reductions.
EquityUses population exposure only. No validated informal-settlement, socioeconomic or accessibility-gap layer is claimed.
ChargingMapped proximity is contextual evidence, not proof of utility capacity, interconnection or site control.
OperatorThe 50/100 value is a constant neutral prior across all routes, not evidence of operator readiness.
TypologyK-means silhouette is 0.373. The groups are descriptive, overlap materially, and contribute no policy points.
GovernanceML estimates. Deterministic models quantify. Policy weights remain human-controlled. The LLM explains and triages evidence; it never silently edits scores or choices.
04 Sources, models and pipeline health+
05 Field observation intake+
Authorized validators can record dated route observations in the same schema used by the pipeline. Do not include rider names, phone numbers, or other personal data.